Proposed Constitutional Amendment Question 2
Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to provide an option to the localities to exempt from taxation the real property of the surviving spouse of any law-enforcement officer, firefighter, search and rescue personnel, or emergency medical services personnel who was killed in the line of duty, where the surviving spouse occupies the real property as his or her principal place of residence and has not remarried?
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
3,031,341 | 79.74% |
| No
|
770,134 | 20.26% |
Proposed Constitutional Amendment Question 2 - SALEM CITY
Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to provide an option to the localities to exempt from taxation the real property of the surviving spouse of any law-enforcement officer, firefighter, search and rescue personnel, or emergency medical services personnel who was killed in the line of duty, where the surviving spouse occupies the real property as his or her principal place of residence and has not remarried?
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
9,603 | 81.97% |
| No
|
2,112 | 18.03% |
# AB - Central Absentee Precinct (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
1,019 | 82.78% |
| No
|
212 | 17.22% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:25 PM
## Provisional (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
0 | 0.00% |
| No
|
0 | 0.00% |
Last Modified on 10/28/2016 03:12 PM
001 - NORTH SALEM NO 2 (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
1,125 | 81.82% |
| No
|
250 | 18.18% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:26 PM
002 - CONEHURST (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
561 | 80.60% |
| No
|
135 | 19.40% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:26 PM
003 - BEVERLY HEIGHTS (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
602 | 84.91% |
| No
|
107 | 15.09% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:27 PM
004 - WEST SALEM (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
821 | 81.85% |
| No
|
182 | 18.15% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:27 PM
005 - NORTH SALEM NO 1 (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
1,133 | 82.04% |
| No
|
248 | 17.96% |
Last Modified on 11/09/2016 04:47 PM
006 - SOUTH SALEM NO 1 (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
596 | 80.32% |
| No
|
146 | 19.68% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:28 PM
007 - SOUTH SALEM NO 2 (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
901 | 82.13% |
| No
|
196 | 17.87% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:29 PM
008 - EAST SALEM (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
348 | 79.09% |
| No
|
92 | 20.91% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:29 PM
009 - SOUTH SIDE HILLS (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
1,215 | 83.56% |
| No
|
239 | 16.44% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:29 PM
010 - HIDDEN VALLEY (09)
| Response | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes
|
1,282 | 80.78% |
| No
|
305 | 19.22% |
Last Modified on 11/08/2016 08:30 PM
Page generated on 01/06/2017 05:15 PM
Legend
Showing a summary of results.
Showing partial race results. Click for full race results.
This office has multiple contested seats.
This locality has a local contest.
This locality does not have a local contest.